tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post4306568779797794212..comments2023-12-28T23:27:33.142-05:00Comments on DLK COLLECTION: Photo Blog Triangle, Version 2.0DLKCOLLECTIONhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14875914464454488384noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post-22666877950223721802010-11-11T17:28:01.026-05:002010-11-11T17:28:01.026-05:00i agree with you, Great blog, thanks for sharingi agree with you, Great blog, thanks for sharingAuctionhttp://www.upbids.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post-47948848173072355462009-03-02T15:13:00.000-05:002009-03-02T15:13:00.000-05:00I totally agree that REFLECT is something much dif...I totally agree that REFLECT is something much different than what is normally captured in COMMENT, and is an impulse I really didn't consider fully when I built the first triangle. The subsequent challenge was that we didn't have data that was separated into these two writing styles, so it was impossible to note the diaristic impulse versus the critical one. I will say that I think collectors are less likely to be following blogs that are heavily diaristic or internally focused; I think these are aimed more at fellow photographers and enthusiasts who are traveling a similar road, rather than at collectors. Would you agree?DLKCOLLECTIONhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14875914464454488384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post-76167856276675917612009-02-28T19:46:00.000-05:002009-02-28T19:46:00.000-05:00I still think of COMMENT and REFLECT as two separa...I still think of COMMENT and REFLECT as two separate impulses. In the Comment category would be something like, "This body of work is great, and here's my reaction to it..." or "What does anyone think about X trend?" <BR/><BR/>I envision the REFLECT category as more of a diary entry. "Yesterday I went out shooting and here's what happened..." or "My latest project has made me think about this..." The reference is much more internal.<BR/><BR/>I suppose Reflect could be loosely grouped under Comment but to me they are not the same.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for sketching out these divisions. I've found them useful and interesting.Blake Andrewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07187987264904729243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post-59740212466399231872009-02-25T17:28:00.000-05:002009-02-25T17:28:00.000-05:00Back-tracked to the original post and found your d...Back-tracked to the original post and found your definitions. Well done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post-8033426300243427162009-02-25T17:17:00.000-05:002009-02-25T17:17:00.000-05:00A helpful piece of the puzzle in this analysis mig...A helpful piece of the puzzle in this analysis might be a basic definition of the categories. I did a similar but more abbreviated project with these bucket names:<BR/><BR/>1. "Look at this" (compare to Curate)<BR/>2. "I'm doing this, my friend's doing that" (compare to promote)<BR/>3. "Original Content" (could encompass your Comment category, but is most likely broader in scope - the best touchstone would be "Could this stand as a magazine article.").<BR/><BR/>One interesting result of this analysis was the large proportion of photo blogosphere content filed in a category that I refer to as "Reactionary" -- linking to or commenting briefly on content on another blog. I suppose this falls under Curate (or meta-Curate?) unless there is some more substantive analysis.<BR/><BR/>Hope this was some food for thought. Thanks for doing this work -- it's quite thought provoking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com