tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post6097164884970400410..comments2023-12-28T23:27:33.142-05:00Comments on DLK COLLECTION: Course: In Focus @Catherine EdelmanDLKCOLLECTIONhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14875914464454488384noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post-51636175353672882512009-08-29T05:19:05.361-04:002009-08-29T05:19:05.361-04:00This article reminds me a bit of the book "El...This article reminds me a bit of the book "Electroboy". I am not saying that you are as irresponsible as he was though!retoque fotograficohttp://www.photorestorationretouching.com/es/inicio.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3057826380522065501.post-11022458379589850832009-08-21T09:27:55.102-04:002009-08-21T09:27:55.102-04:00I have received a few emails overnight pointing ou...I have received a few emails overnight pointing out the inherent conflict of a gallery providing this type of course, and asking about the potential bias that could occur. My view is that it is almost certain that at some point in the course, the gallery stable will be used to illustrate various points or be introduced as examples of certain kinds of work. I'd like to think the folks at the gallery are smart enought to understand that if the salesmanship is too overt, people will be turned off and their credibility will be damaged; it can't be an infomerical for their artists. As such, I think there will of course be some subtle sales messages included, but collectors should be savvy enough to see it coming, and still gather meaningful value from the larger education provided by the course. And if along the way, a collector is introduced to an artist that the gallery represents that they have an affinity for, everyone wins. Like anything, collectors need to have a normal dose of skepticism for what they hear, whatever the source.DLKCOLLECTIONhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14875914464454488384noreply@blogger.com