data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36e08/36e08b91b22197d05e33eee16f32924304864b98" alt=""
The following artists/photographers have been included in the exhibit, with the number of works on view in parentheses:
Vito Acconici (12 black and white images framed as 1 work)
Doug Aitken (1)
Darren Almond (1 video)
Lothar Baumgarten (1)
Matthew Buckingham (1)
Rineke Dijkstra (6)
Felix Gonzalez-Torres (1)
On Kawara (47 postcards framed as 1 work)
Svetlana Kopystiansky (3)
Richard Long (1)
NASA (1)
Bruce Nauman (1 video)
Dennis Oppenheim (1 diptych)
Allen Ruppersberg (9 paired prints/texts framed as 1 work)
Ed Ruscha (1 book)
Fazal Sheikh (1)
Erin Shirreff (1 video)
Robert Smithson (4 images framed as 1 work)
Thomas Struth (1)
Anne Turyn (1)
Unknown (1)
VALIE EXPORT (1)
Jeff Wall (1)
Weng Fen (1)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcf8a/dcf8a0f75e03895ba94c79199a88f1ea0b8e2648" alt=""
.
The newest iteration in this series takes on a broad intellectual construct that could loosely be called "travel", but really contains many more abstract, amorphous and obtuse ideas: the elusiveness of place, the globalization of experience, the sense of being a refugee, the passing of time, and the dislocations and displacements that have become commonplace in our modern world. The first half of the exhibit goes back to the 1960s and 1970s and explores these ideas primarily through the lens of Conceptualism. Vito Acconci makes flash photos of audiences in theaters, On Kawara sends time stamped postcards, Ed Ruscha documents the Sunset Strip, and Bruce Nauman jitters across his studio.
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd6d8/fd6d8240f0adb8c1bd484f11517b3fcd3c50a8d7" alt=""
.
The progression from the earlier work to the images from the past decade is quite jerky, a bit too "before" and "after", rather than a building up and evolution of ideas. While everything does in the end connect into the larger thematic undercurrents of the show, this is the most cerebral curatorial effort we've seen in this gallery space; it takes some active thinking and wall-text parsing to bring it all together - I doubt that the wandering, fly-by viewer will succeed in teasing out all of the references.
.
While I certainly enjoyed seeing many of the works on display in this show, I remain unconvinced that these thematic exhibits are either memorable in a larger, long-term sense or successful in being a driving force in the contemporary dialogue. Part of this comes from holding the Met to a higher standard than most other venues, and part of it is a maddening sense of lost opportunity, of fantasizing about what could have been shown in this space in these long blocks of time that might have really been spectacular. All in, this is a thoughtfully constructed and generally well-executed effort, it's just that I continue to hope for more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf5fa/cf5fa4fddcc9fdef0bc37d9c74811ae15c5b2f90" alt=""
Rating: * (one star) GOOD (rating system described here)
Transit Hub:
Through February 21st
2 comments:
Loren,
Once again (and I mean this in a good way) your capacity to find some lustre in and otherwise dull and unimportant show reveals itself. This is the Met's version of Contemporary Photography -- out-of-step (Fen, Buckingham) and either insignificant (unknown, Svetlana Kopystiansky) or worked to death (Struth, Ruscha, Dijkstra). The show is not saved by its use of the term "Passages", suggesting some recent historical milestones or shifts in photographic paradigms. The show is simply a hodge-podge of work, some wonderful, some boring, and all incoherently assembled by a curatorial staff that is not really participating in the dialogue about Contemporary Photography.
JB
Ditto
Merritt Hewitt
Post a Comment