Showing posts with label Candida Höfer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Candida Höfer. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Auction: Photographie, June 14, 2013 @Van Ham

Van Ham wraps up the Spring season in Germany later this week in Cologne with a various owner Photographs sale with a broad base of lower priced German/European material. Overall, there are a total of 216 lots on offer in this sale, with a Total High Estimate of €566800.

Here's the statistical breakdown:

Total Low Lots (high estimate up to and including €7500): 201
Total Low Estimate (sum of high estimates of Low lots): €306800

Total Mid Lots (high estimate between €7500 and €35000): 13
Total Mid Estimate: €140000

Total High Lots (high estimate above €35000): 2
Total High Estimate: €120000

The top lot by High estimate is tied between two lots: lot 1111, Christian Boltanski, Jewish School, Große Hamburger Straße, Berlin, 1939, 1993 (image at right, middle, via Van Ham) and lot 1221, Candida Höfer, Teatro Colon, Buenos Aires, 2006 (image at right, top, via Van Ham), both estimated at €50000-60000.

Here is the list of the photographers who are represented by four or more lots in the sale (with the number of lots in parentheses):

August Sander (14)
Albert Renger-Patzsch (9)
Bernd and Hilla Becher (4)
Robert Bothner (4)
Henri Cartier-Bresson (4)
Götz Diergarten (4)
Klaus Herzog (4)
Peter Keetman (4)
Tata Ronkholz (4)
Paul Wolff & Alfred Tritschler (4)
WOLS (4)

Other lots of interest include lot 1228, Li Wei, Freedegree Over 25th Story, 2004, estimated at €5000-6000 (image at right, bottom, via Van Ham).

The complete lot by lot catalog can be found here.

Photographie
June 14th

Van Ham Kunstauktionen
Schönhauser Straße 10 - 16
D - 50968 Köln

Monday, April 4, 2011

Auction: Photographs, April 9, 2011 @Phillips

Phillips wraps up the flurry of major activity in the New York spring Photographs season with its broad various owner sale on Saturday. The auction includes a well-balanced selection of vintage and fresh contemporary work, with plenty of high end lots (headlined by a Cindy Sherman). Overall, there are a total of 261 lots on offer, with a total High estimate of $4913400.
.
Here's the statistical breakdown:

Total Low Lots (high estimate up to and including $10000): 138
Total Low Estimate (sum of high estimates of Low lots): $931400

Total Mid Lots (high estimate between $10000 and $50000): 102
Total Mid Estimate: $2217000

Total High Lots (high estimate above $50000): 21
Total High Estimate: $1765000

The top lot by High estimate is lot 171, Cindy Sherman, Untitled #278, 1993, at $200000-300000.
.
The following is the list of the photographers represented by five or more lots in this sale (with the number of lots on offer in parentheses):

Robert Mapplethorpe (8)
Vik Muniz (7)
Edward Weston (7)
Henri Cartier-Bresson (6)
Robert Frank (6)
Candida Höfer (6)
Irving Penn (6)
Harry Callahan (5)
Hiroshi Sugimoto (5)

(Lot 86, Candida Höfer, Playfair Library Hall, The University of Edinburgh, II, 1998/1999, at $8000-12000, image at right, middle, lot 196, Elger Esser, Doubt, Frankreich, 1999, at $50000-70000, image at right, top, and lot 211, Desiree Dolron, Xteriors VI, 2003, at $40000-60000, image at right, bottom, all via Phillips.)

The complete lot by lot catalog can be found here.
April 9th

450 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Auction Results: Contemporary Art Evening and Day Sales, February 15 and 16, 2011 @Sotheby's London

Sotheby's began the 2011 photography auction season with solid outcomes at its Contemporary Art sales in London last week. All 6 of the photographs in the Evening sale found buyers, helping boost the Total Sale Proceeds above the Total Pre-Sale High Estimate. With an overall Buy-In rate across the two sales under 18%, it was an auspicious start to the season. The only hiccup was the "Orgy of the Rich" protest which disrupted the sale (coverage here via Hyperallergic).

The summary statistics are below (all results include the buyer’s premium):
.
Total Lots: 28
Pre Sale Low Total Estimate: £2094000
Pre Sale High Total Estimate: £2967000
Total Lots Sold: 23
Total Lots Bought In: 5
Buy In %: 17.86%
Total Sale Proceeds: £3037950

Here is the breakdown (using the Low, Mid, and High definitions from the preview post, here):

Low Total Lots: 0
Low Sold: NA
Low Bought In: NA
Buy In %: NA
Total Low Estimate: £0
Total Low Sold: NA

Mid Total Lots: 12
Mid Sold: 10
Mid Bought In: 2
Buy In %: 16.67%
Total Mid Estimate: £182000
Total Mid Sold: £198100

High Total Lots: 16
High Sold: 13
High Bought In: 3
Buy In %: 18.75%
Total High Estimate: £2785000
Total High Sold: £2839850

The top lot by High estimate was lot 3, Cindy Sherman, Untitled #87, 1981, at £400000-600000; it was also the top outcome of the sale at £577250.

An efficient 100.00% of the lots that sold had proceeds in or above their estimate. There were only two surprises in these sales (defined as having proceeds of at least double the high estimate):

Lot 187, Candida Höfer, Biblioteca Seminario Patriarcale Venezia II, 2002, at £43250 (image at right, bottom, via Sotheby's)
Lot 267, Andy Warhol, Beware of Dog, 1976-1986, at £91250 (image at right, top, via Sotheby's)

Complete lot by lot results can be found here (Evening) and here (Day).
.
Sotheby's
34-35 New Bond Street
London W1A 2AA

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Auction Results: Contemporary Art Evening and Day Sales, October 13 and 14, 2010 @Phillips London

The photography on offer in Phillips' Frieze week Contemporary Art sales in London last week delivered rather uninspiring results. The Buy-In rate for photography (across both the Evening and Day auctions) was over 30% and the Total Sale Proceeds from the photo lots missed the low end of estimate range. It certainly doesn't help when 3 out of the top 4 lots fail to sell, but the lack of positive surprises in the two sales says that the bidding action was relatively muted.

The summary statistics are below (all results include the buyer’s premium):

Total Lots: 36
Pre Sale Low Total Estimate: £471000
Pre Sale High Total Estimate: £657000
Total Lots Sold: 25
Total Lots Bought In: 11
Buy In %: 30.56%
Total Sale Proceeds: £442700

Here is the breakdown (using the Low, Mid, and High definitions from the preview post, here):

Low Total Lots: 3
Low Sold: 1
Low Bought In: 2
Buy In %: 66.67%
Total Low Estimate: £13000
Total Low Sold: £3500

Mid Total Lots: 25
Mid Sold: 19
Mid Bought In: 6
Buy In %: 24.00%
Total Mid Estimate: £349000
Total Mid Sold: £265500

High Total Lots: 8
High Sold: 5
High Bought In: 3
Buy In %: 37.50%
Total High Estimate: £295000
Total High Sold: £173700

The top lot by High estimate was lot 212, Andreas Gursky, Cairo Übersicht, 1993, at £35000-45000; it did not sell. The top outcome of the sale was lot 208, Candida Höfer, Théâtre de la Monnaie/Koninklijke Muntschouwburg, 2006, at £46850. (Image at right, via Phillips.)

88.00% of the lots that sold had proceeds above or in the estimate range, and there were no surprises in these sales (defined as having proceeds of at least double the high estimate).

Complete lot by lot results can be found here (Evening) and here (Day).

Howick Place
London SW1P 1BB

Friday, May 14, 2010

Auction Results: Contemporary Art, May 12 and 13, 2010 @Sotheby's

The results for the photography buried in Sotheby's various Contemporary Art sales earlier this week, coupled with those at Christie's in the days before, are making me think that the confident art market swagger is on its way to a full recovery. Sotheby's total photo proceeds topped their high estimate with room to spare, with a buy-in rate hovering around 10% and more than 50% of the lots that sold selling above their range. Virtually all the high end lots found buyers. On a going forward basis, I think we can expect this positive, optimistic momentum to swell the Fall consignments.

The summary statistics are below (all results include the buyer’s premium):

Total Lots: 52
Pre Sale Low Total Estimate: $2894000
Pre Sale High Total Estimate: $4099000
Total Lots Sold: 46
Total Lots Bought In: 6
Buy In %: 11.54%
Total Sale Proceeds: $4255750

Here is the breakdown (using the Low, Mid, and High definitions from the preview post, here):

Low Total Lots: 1
Low Sold: 1
Low Bought In: 0
Buy In %: 00.00%
Total Low Estimate: $10000
Total Low Sold: $8125

Mid Total Lots: 30
Mid Sold: 25
Mid Bought In: 5
Buy In %: 16.67%
Total Mid Estimate: $849000
Total Mid Sold: $896125

High Total Lots: 21
High Sold: 20
High Bought In: 1
Buy In %: 4.76%
Total High Estimate: $3240000
Total High Sold: $3351500

The top photography lot by High estimate was lot 49, Andreas Gursky, Rimini, 2003, at $500000-700000; it was also the top outcome of the sales at $722500.
.
97.83% of the lots that sold had proceeds in or above the estimate range. There were a total of 4 surprises in this sale (defined as having proceeds of at least double the high estimate):
.
Lot 327, Matthew Day Jackson, Bucket, 2007, at $34375
Lot 425, Candida Höfer, Musee Du Louvre, Paris XV, 2005, at $104500 (image at right, top, via Sotheby's)
Lot 431, James Casebere, Spiral Staircase, 2002-2003, at $50000 (image at right, via Sotheby's)
Lot 432, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Satellite City Towers, 2002, at $28125
.
Complete lot by lot results can be found here (Evening) and here (Day).

1334 York Avenue
New York, NY 10021

Friday, March 12, 2010

Candida Höfer, Florence and Naples @Sonnabend

JTF (just the facts): A total of 7 large scale works, framed in blond wood with no matting, and hung in the entry and the center room in the rear of the gallery. The c-prints range in size from roughly 75x61 to 80x102 and are made in editions of 7. All of the negatives are from 2008 and 2009, and were taken in Florence and Naples. A monograph of this body of work (entitled Napoli) has recently been published by Schirmer/Mosel (here). (Installation shots at right.)

Comments/Context: After years of seeing shows of Candida Höfer's images of ornate public spaces and interiors and thinking they all looked generally the same, this exhibit of recent work from Florence and Naples made me think quite a bit more deeply about her artistic approach. For the first time, I got beyond the documentary novelty/awe of the over-the-top constructions and ornamentations themselves, and started to think about these pictures as a kind of nuanced portraiture, to see the artist's style more clearly layered over the subtleties of architectural personality.

In a certain way, these Italian pictures look like any number of other pictures she has taken previously: formal rooms, frescoed ceilings, checkerboard marble floors, classical sculpture, cherubs, flashy chandeliers, and rows of columns. There are impressive palaces, ballrooms, entry halls and libraries, all designed as overt signals of wealth, power, and status. Each is entirely empty of people, the polished floors reflecting the pure white light which pours quietly in through the windows.

I guess it was the simple thought exercise of comparing these images to how I would expect these same famous rooms to look on post cards in the nearby gift shops that started me down a more complicated reading of these photographs; when they're printed large and hung as individual objects, it's sometimes easy to just get lost in the grandeur of the prints and forget to think about the subtle differences in composition, framing, or lighting that Höfer has employed.
.
If we looked at a series of Avedon or Penn portraits, all taken with monochrome backgrounds and frontal poses, we wouldn't say they all looked the same; we'd see the tiny gestures that have been captured that make the people individuals, and we'd see the overlay of the photographer's approach augmenting the exploration of these often hidden features. The same is true here: I suddenly became aware of how the square framing had been used to better capture the elongated decorated ceilings, or how the curves of a chandelier were carefully placed to interact with the balconies of a double height room. I also saw how Höfer had highlighted the cluster of modern plastic chairs that were set up in one of the ballrooms and realized how they formed a surprising juxtaposition to the ornate religious frescoes and gold leaf on the walls and ceilings. Even the David (perhaps the most cliched subject imaginable, often seen looking up at its magnificence) was photographed in an unexpected way that made the immense statue look more vulnerable, the grandeur of the domed glass atrium in which it stands dwarfing the iconic sculpture.
.
All in, I was much less distracted by the grand locations themselves in this body of work, and as a result, saw much more of Höfer's aesthetic approach than I have noticed previously. I've come to the conclusion that Höfer's work cannot be appreciated via the normal "stand for 5 seconds and move on" approach to gallery hopping; it requires the patience to let the initial eye-catching drama dissipate and dissolve a little, so that the more subtle details of the photographic craft can come though.

Collector's POV: The prints in this show are priced between 45000 and 50000€, based on size. Höfer's work is readily available in the secondary markets, in a variety of dimensions and edition sizes. Smaller pieces can be found well under $10000 (often in editions of up to 100), while the larger works (printed in much smaller editions, usually 6) range between $20000 and $50000, with a few outliers even higher.

Rating: * (one star) GOOD (rating system described here)

Transit Hub:
  • Architecture of Absence, ICA UPenn, 2006 (here)
  • NY Times review, 2004 (here)
Candida Höfer, Florence and Naples
Through April 17th

Sonnabend Gallery (artnet page here)
536 West 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Book: The Düsseldorf School of Photography, Stefan Gronert (ed.)

JTF (just the facts): Published in 2010 by Aperture (here). 320 pages, with 162 color and black and white images by 11 different photographers. Includes a foreword by Lothar Schirmer, an essay by Stefan Gronert, and summary biographies, exhibition lists and bibliographies for each of the artists. The German version of the book is being published by Schirmer/Mosel (here). (Cover shot at right, via Amazon.)

The photographers included/discussed are:

Bernd & Hilla Becher
Laurenz Berges
Elger Esser
Andreas Gursky
Candida Höfer
Axel Hütte
Simone Nieweg
Thomas Ruff
Jörg Sasse
Thomas Struth
Petra Wunderlich

Comments/Context: The Düsseldorf school of photography is probably the largest topic in contemporary photography that has yet to receive the kind of in-depth scholarly treatment we would expect for such an important and influential artistic movement. While I'm sure there have been quite a few masters and Ph.D. theses that have been written about the Bechers and their students, until the publication of this book, there have been effectively no survey style volumes brought to market with the broader public in mind. Given the many monographs and exhibition catalogues that have been written about these photographers individually, the gathering of a representative sample of the various artists' work is the lesser of the challenges here; the real test falls to the essay and how coherently and insightfully it ties together what heretofore have been generally separate but parallel narratives. We have all been searching for someone to help connect the dots and fill in the gaps; I'm happy to report that this book is certainly a good start.

One important semantic definition is required before we get to the analysis: what is it we mean by the term the "school"? In general, I think there are two possible answers as applied to artistic movements: the narrow - the education derived from a specific set of teachings/learnings (i.e. the how/what of the curriculum at the Düsseldorf Kunstakademie or the Yale School of Art and how it was absorbed by specific students), and the broad - the larger geographic and temporal phenomenon (i.e. Düsseldorf or Helsinki as the umbrella term for a common style of working).

This volume (and its keystone essay) has chosen to focus on the Düsseldorf school in the broad sense, looking for the larger commonalities seen in its most successful and best known adherents. It lays at the feet of the Bechers the "emancipation of photography": the critical artistic mindset that photography was fully equal to painting, the results of which are embodied in the downstream success of the students who wholeheartedly embraced this unorthodox-at-the-time concept. It also implies an amorphous teaching by osmosis approach, where the Bechers were effectively leading by example: off doing their own highly stringent and objective documentary work, using the series and typology as modes for working and comparison, all underneath a rigid conceptual framework, with the students watching and absorbing some or all of what they saw as they saw fit. The narrative is thus one of commonality rather than causation: the students all started from a generally similar location; as they grew and matured as artists and selectively incorporated the Bechers' teachings over time, they went off in different but often parallel directions.

While there are some anecdotal comparisons and back and forth between the artists, in general, the book follows each photographer down his or her own particular evolutionary path, often starting prior to their involvement with the Bechers, and running to the present, now decades after the teacher/student relationship has ended. Each photographer gets a short biographical analysis, often through the lens of the Düsseldorf similarities. We see some exploring the limits of conceptual ideas (Ruff, Hütte, Esser, Struth, Sasse), while others have consistently worked in subject matter based series (Höfer, Wunderlich, Nieweg, Struth); over time, many have experimented with the use of large formats and prints (Höfer, Hütte, Nieweg, Struth, Berges, Ruff, Esser, Gursky). The challenge here is that most of these artists have worked through a handful of different projects over their careers to date, moving back and forth between working styles and approaches - the Düsseldorf narrative is therefore circular and cyclical rather than strictly linear, the Bechers' influence waxing and waning as the artists continually evolve and reinvent themselves.

As such, the story of the Düsseldorf school is not nearly as neat and tidy as one might expect from the rigid Germans; the Bechers put down some foundation concepts, but their students have long since moved beyond those initial ideas. Perhaps it is the mark of great teachers that they imparted their wisdom and experience about successful methods for discovering one's artistic voice through photography, without imposing their own specific vision too strongly.

While this book provides the satisfying summary and overview I have outlined, I found myself still wishing for more specifics; perhaps the next scholarly book on the Düsseldorf school needs to limit its scope to the period when the photographers were actually studying with the Bechers, and needs to cover in more detail how the curriculum was embodied in the early pictures. I'd also like to see more work from a broader range of the students (not just the "winners") to see how the teachings got applied in different ways. Similarly, I think some commentary from the artists themselves on what they took away from the Becher experience would be enlightening. Clearly, all of these photographers have long since moved beyond their early education, but I for one would be interested to hear what if anything they still find of value.

Overall, this book fills a gaping hole in the history of photography. It provides a well-selected sampler of the work of the best known members of the Düsseldorf school and offers a readable explanation of how it all fits together. While I have an insatiable appetite for more on this group of photographers, this volume certainly delivers a solid and thoughtful introduction to one of the most important movements in contemporary photography.

Collector’s POV: In many ways, there isn't much "new" information to be found in this book on the best known photographers in the group. It was therefore the sections on Petra Wunderlich, Simone Nieweg, Jörg Sasse, and Laurenz Berges that were the eye openers for me, in terms of exposing me more fully to some of the other students who are a little further out of spotlight. I also think the essay was helpful in clarifying my rudimentary understanding of the evolution of both Axel Hütte and Elger Esser, neither of which I have felt particularly comfortable with in the past.

Transit Hub:
  • Review: Conscientious (here)

Friday, January 30, 2009

Candida Höfer, Philadelphia @Sonnabend

JTF (just the facts): A total of 12 large scale color C-prints, framed in blond wood frames with no matting, arrayed in the entry and two rooms in the rear of the gallery. Images range in size from roughly 60x64 to nearly 70x100. All of the negatives are from 2007. (Installation shots with significant glare at right and below.)

Comments/Context: German photographer Candida Höfer has spent the better part of the past 30 years making huge deadpan images of public architectural spaces around the world. She has captured museums, hotels, banks, libraries, and palaces of all kinds, always devoid of people and often lit with pure daylight. Her current show at Sonnabend displays a group of new pictures taken in some of Philadelphia's most ornate Federal buildings.
.
Höfer is, of course, one of the group of highly successful students of the Bechers at the Dusseldorf Academy of Art, and her work shares their clinical approach to picture making. The images are all taken from a rigid square frontal position, the subject matter has variation within an overall sameness, and the prints are made with a high degree of technical mastery.

Despite all of the over the top ornamental flourishes found in these rooms, the interiors are chillingly vast and empty, like tombs that have recently been unearthed and opened to anthropologists. While there are frequently subtle effects resulting from the placement of the light, for the most part, the images are dry and emotionless, in contrast to the clear hopes for grandeur and awe of the builders.

We have often seen Höfer's work in the pages of glossy design magazines, her images hung on the walls of flashy apartments and newly redecorated lofts. It seems they often serve as stand ins for a dreamed about library or ballroom, a symbol of decorative luxury just out of reach. For us, there seems to be something absent, a missing connection that would normally draw us back to the images again and again. While Höfer has pointed her camera at a vast array of amazing places, there doesn't seem to be anything new, fresh or memorable going on, and over time, the images become surprisingly interchangeable. And in a mind bending twist, perhaps that is just the point.

Collector's POV: Candida Höfer's work is readily available in the secondary market, in a range of sizes from small to gigantic. The pictures in this show are priced between 40000 and 50000 Euros. At auction, the smaller pieces can be found well under $10000 (often in editions of up to 100), while the larger works (perhaps more representative of what she's trying to do and printed in much smaller editions, usually 6) seem to range between $20000 and $50000, give or take a few outliers on the high side.

Rating: * (one star) GOOD (rating system described here)

Candida Höfer, Philadelphia
Through February 14

Sonnabend Gallery (artnet page here)
536 West 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011